The Clinton Herald, Clinton, Iowa


November 3, 2012

READERS' LETTERS: Court was wrong with gay marriage ruling

CLINTON — Perhaps you too have received an “education” from some of Iowa’s political/legal elites?

Specifically, former Iowa Supreme Court Justices Ternus, Baker, and Streit, along with the Iowa Bar Association, have told us ignorant folk the 2010 ousting of the aforementioned judges was a travesty that should not be repeated with Justice Wiggins this Nov. 6th.

In a recent, statewide editorial piece these former Justices claim their unanimous 2009 “Varnum decision” (that which ushered in so-called same-sex marriage in Iowa) was a just and constitutional ruling, even going so far as to quote some of our country’s Founding Fathers.

I humbly submit what I believe we everyday Iowans already know in our hearts: the Justices’ understanding and application of the rule of law is utterly incorrect.

First, Iowa’s Constitution doesn’t have an “equal protection clause” like they claim. The highly respected, Harvard-educated Constitutionalist, Herb Titus, has explained it is clearly “a privileges and immunities clause... a much older common law provision.” Even if we granted the point, as WHO Radio’s Jan Mickelson first taught me, we do not grant (legal) status (a.k.a. equal protection) to behaviors of individuals or groups. In fact, our society limits and even punishes all types of behaviors.

Second, it is true we have three separate branches of government, but those branches ARE NOT EQUAL! Fact: both the Iowa and US Constitutions allow the Legislature to limit the jurisdiction of the courts as they wish. The US Congress can even eliminate entire levels of the court if they desire. Equal, they say?

Third, the Justices claim their decision was “based on the rule of law and nothing else”; they even cite the Justice’s oath of office, in which each Justice vows “to support the Constitution of the United States and… the State of Iowa.” Too many political/legal elites fail to remember that The US Constitution is the “how” of our government, which must always be viewed through the lens of the “why” document: the Declaration of Independence. The Declaration opens with a reference to “The Laws of Nature and Nature’s God” and continues with “we hold these truths to be self-evident... all men are created equal... endowed by their Creator with certain inalienable rights... To secure these rights governments are instituted among Men, deriving their powers from the consent of the governed... whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it...” Iowa’s Constitution also opens with a reference to “the Supreme Being”... “He...” Could it be that American law, and Iowa law, is modeled after and subject to the Law of the God who not only “created the heavens and the earth” but also created the institute of marriage (between one man and one woman) so many years ago? Justice Wiggins and the rest of the 2009 judicial activists botched a no-brainer. The behavior condoned in Varnum simply has no legal standing because the Supreme Law - “of Nature and Nature’s God” - doesn’t allow for it! I know this is hard to understand in a politically correct culture, but truth is Truth whether we like it or not.

Fourth, any who oppose the ousted Justices and the Iowa Bar are accused of “politicizing the Iowa Supreme Court” and are told that our system of judicial retention (which is a great system, by the way) is only for the purpose of removing Justices due to incompetence, lack of ethics, etc. Remember that “self-evident” part from the Declaration? It is pretty clear to this legal simpleton that Justice Wiggins and the rest of the 2009 bench fail the competence (and likely also a simple Biology 101) test.  Fifth, the more pragmatic among us might like to know the same Iowa Bar Association insisting upon Wiggins’ retention scored him an “F” (only 63.3%) in favor of retention in their 2012 Judicial Review compared to his fellow Justices’ ratings of >/= 93.9%. Last but not least, a quote from Justice Wiggins himself: “So tell me, in your best way, how we can get around the Iowa Constitution.”

Check it out at and please remember to flip your ballot and vote “No Wiggins” on Nov. 6. Then, let’s we the people hold our Legislature and Governor accountable to grow a backbone and fix this mess.

Lucas A. Frobish,



We need Andrew Naeve!

If you have to show a photo ID to get on an airplane, open a checking account, and to buy a beer, you should have to show an ID to vote. I have been working hard but the Iowa Senate has stopped Voter ID. We need common sense in the Iowa Senate! We need Voter ID! We need Andrew Naeve!

Matt Schultz,


Matt Schultz is Iowa’s Secretary of State.


It is with enthusiasm and excitement that I write to endorse Andrew Naeve for the State Senate of Iowa.

Andrew is a young man of faith from the county, with a college degree in Farm Business Management and Finance from Cornell University, and years of experience owning a small family farm business.  He understands not only the opportunities, but also the challenges of daily working to better the lives of not only his immediate family, but those of his employees, and the community that he’s chosen to live and invest in.

Andrew was born and raised in eastern Iowa.  He is one of us.  He understands the issues and the opportunities.

 As we all know, job growth and creation comes from those who own and operate small businesses, not our government.  Those who have to make a payroll every week know how to operate within the means they have been blessed with.  Andrew has a passion for the State of Iowa to control government spending and I believe he has the experience and the background to lead and help the Iowa Senate accomplish this goal.

As the owner of another small business (Fulton Corporation) and a resident of the city of Clinton, I trust Andrew to represent the interest of this area in Des Moines.  

On Tuesday, I ask you to enthusiastically cast a vote for Andrew Naeve for the State Senate of Iowa.

Dee Willoughby,


Text Only
  • Dangerous Darkies Logo.png Redskins not the only nickname to cause a stir

    Daniel Snyder has come under fire for refusing to change the mascot of his NFL team, the Washington Redskins. The Redskins, however, are far from being the only controversial mascot in sports history.  Here is a sampling of athletic teams from all areas of the sports world that were outside the norm.

    July 29, 2014 3 Photos

  • Off and on the record Let us now praise anonymous sources.The new White House press secretary got into a familiar old spat with the White House press corps the other day over the use of anonymous sources.Josh Earnest — has there ever been a more perfectly named White Hous

    July 25, 2014

  • Be more informed

    Blame the city.That is a favorite pastime of many, including me at times. Driving over that pesky pothole or paying that annual property tax bill can lead to some choice words referencing the city. Nobody takes the brunt of being the scapegoat more t

    July 25, 2014

  • CCC thanks community, collaborators for successful movie night Clinton Community College would like to thank those who participated in the free outdoor movie showing of “Captain America – Winter Soldier” on the evening of Friday, July 18.We are grateful to have such wonderful community collaborators in the Erick

    July 25, 2014

  • Lindley, Tom.jpg Better police needed for college teams enticed to cheat

    The NCAA once cracked down on colleges that went too far luring top prospects, then it targeted teams that lathered players with special treatment. That was until the NCAA's get-tough approach backfired, rendering it ineffective and creating an opportunity for those who want to play dirty.

    July 24, 2014 1 Photo

  • Lindley, Tom.jpg Expectations too high for a rehabbing Woods

    Tiger Woods finished near bottom last weekend at Royal Liverpool, drawing out his drought of major tournament wins. Despite the disappointing showing, Woods' return to form remains a matter of when, not if.

    July 22, 2014 1 Photo

  • Todd Akin's back again to talk of rape So, Todd Akin is back and he’s talking rape again.You remember what happened last time. The would-be Missouri senator torpedoed his campaign two years ago after suggesting in a TV interview that if a woman is a victim of “legitimate rape,” she is unl

    July 22, 2014

  • Sadness remains as two-year mark passes in cousins' case As most citizens of the Cedar Valley are well aware, July 13 marked two years since the disappearance of cousins Elizabeth Collins and Lyric Cook-Morrissey of Evansdale.The passage of time provides some semblance of healing, but the sadness, particul

    July 22, 2014

  • UI needs to keep its admission standards high There’s been a lot of talk lately — most of it coming from the leadership of the Iowa state Board of Regents — about the University of Iowa not being passionate enough about its recruitment of in-state undergraduates. Regent president Bruce Rastetter

    July 21, 2014

  • Vote fraud myths meet voting rights reality Before she was allowed to register and vote for the first time in Franklin County, North Carolina, Rosanell Eaton had to read the entire preamble to the U.S. Constitution out loud in front of three men in the county courthouse.Eaton is black. The thr

    July 21, 2014 1 Story


With the Clinton County Justice Coordinating Commission and the Clinton County Board of Supervisors discussing proposals to construct a new jail, do you think the time has come for Clinton County to construct such a facility?

     View Results